How does "Community Policing"
by the public police differ from
"Neighborhood Policing" provided by the
Patrol Special Police Officers?
|
|
|
| COMMUNITY
POLICING PUBLIC POLICE |
NEIGHBORHOOD POLICING PATROL SPECIAL POLICE |
|
|
|
1.
|
Trained in a culture of law enforcement involving law
enforcement and protection first, service second. |
1. |
Trained in a culture of care with service first,
including protection. |
|
2. |
Derives from government/public
policing
|
2. |
Derives from client and
community |
|
3. |
Proves police are part of
society as much
as part of government
|
3. |
Patrol Special Police Officers
are already part of society, not part of government |
|
4. |
Re-directs public
police from law enforcement from the top
down, to involving/listening to the community. |
4. |
Already directed at crime
prevention and order; already listens to clients &
community. |
|
5. |
Must provide this while
still providing law enforcement
|
5. |
100% time devoted to crime
prevention/order maintenance |
|
6. |
With off
duty SFPD Officers, community policing is done on overtime at
high cost. |
6. |
Full-time job is
neighborhood policing |
|
7. |
Must serve large district
or service area; cannot focus on one small service
area
|
7. |
Focus on one small service
area |
|
8. |
Subject to interruption by paperwork, and responding to
citizen calls |
8. |
Maintains necessary and
efficient paperwork; responds to client/neighborhood
incident calls in small area |
|
9. |
Invisible, often out of
district; slower response time
|
9. |
Visible in district; fast
response time |
|
10. |
SFPD subject to
attrition/turnover
|
10. |
Many Patrol Special Police Officers have 20-40 yrs. of service, some 20+ yrs.
serving one client |
|
11. |
Must re-learn
democratic/participatory model service
|
11. |
Nature of service from
start is democratic and participatory |
|
12. |
Defensive posture is tradition/nature of operation |
12. |
Receptive, friendly posture is tradition/nature of
operation
|
|
13. |
Requires the empowerment of citizens to allow them to
begin the process of policing themselves. |
13. |
Clients/citizens already empowered and part of the
policing process from initiation of service. |
|
14. |
All of the research into CP shows that the most
important factor in any city conversion (from
traditional incident-driven aw enforcement) to CP, is a
change in the way the city leaders interact. (According
to website City of Monrovia, CA) |
14. |
The only need for NP is that city leaders minimize
regulatory interference and standardize day-to-day
program administrative interpretation of regulations.
This permits maximum and desirable marketing and
education efforts to let citizens know about the NP
safety option, and it provide a reasonable amount of
tools to make PSP as effective as possible.
|
